KG

Dr. Kunal Gupta

Consultant Dermatologist

Introduction: Understanding Mal De Meleda

Mal de Meleda represents one of dermatology's most fascinating genetic puzzles — a rare autosomal recessive genodermatosis characterized by diffuse palmoplantar hyperkeratosis. First documented by Stulli in 1826 and later refined by Meleda in 1829 (hence its eponymous name), this condition continues to challenge clinicians with its complex presentation and limited treatment options.

What makes this condition particularly intriguing is the transgradient variant, an exceedingly rare subtype that extends beyond the typical palms-and-soles distribution to involve the wrists and ankles. This unique pattern of progression from distal to proximal extremities distinguishes it from other forms of palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) and poses significant diagnostic challenges.

Genetic Foundation

Mal de Meleda results from mutations in the SLURP1 gene (Secreted Ly-6/uPAR-Related Protein-1) located on chromosome 8q24.3. These genetic alterations disrupt normal keratinocyte function, leading to the characteristic excessive skin thickening observed in affected individuals.

Case Presentation: An 18-Year Journey

This case report presents an 18-year-old male with a compelling clinical history that exemplifies the progressive nature of transgradient Mal de Meleda.

Clinical History

The patient's journey began 18 years prior to presentation, when he first developed yellowish, thickened skin on his soles during infancy. Over the subsequent two years, the condition progressed to involve his palms, demonstrating the typical ascending pattern characteristic of the transgradient variant.

Presenting Symptoms

  • Primary Complaint: Thickened, yellowish, waxy skin on palms and soles
  • Associated Symptoms: Severe itching, scaling, and fissuring
  • Secondary Effects: Foul odor from affected areas due to bacterial colonization
  • Functional Impact: Pain and discomfort affecting daily activities
  • Previous Treatments: Unsuccessful attempts with emollients, topical steroids, and salicylic acid

Family History

A critical diagnostic clue emerged from the family history: the patient's younger brother exhibited similar symptoms, supporting the autosomal recessive inheritance pattern characteristic of Mal de Meleda. This familial clustering significantly strengthens the diagnosis and highlights the genetic nature of the condition.

Clinical Pearl

The presence of similar symptoms in siblings strongly suggests an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern, warranting genetic counseling for the family. In communities with higher rates of consanguinity, the prevalence of Mal de Meleda may be elevated.

Clinical Examination Findings

Physical examination revealed the hallmark features of transgradient Mal de Meleda:

Palmoplantar Features

  • Distribution: Multiple yellowish-waxy hyperkeratotic plaques on both palms and soles
  • Transgradient Extension: Lesions extending beyond palms and soles to wrists and ankles with well-demarcated margins
  • Surface Characteristics: Severe scaling with deep fissuring
  • Color: Characteristic straw-yellow appearance
  • Margin Definition: Sharp, well-defined borders at transition zones

Digital Involvement

  • Finger Changes: Conical tapering of distal digits
  • Dermatoglyphics: Complete loss of normal fingerprint patterns
  • Functional Impact: Reduced fine motor dexterity

Nail Changes

The nails exhibited several dystrophic changes:

  • Thickening of nail plates (onychauxis)
  • Prominent longitudinal ridging
  • Dystrophic alterations in nail architecture
  • Yellow discoloration consistent with underlying hyperkeratosis

Comprehensive Diagnostic Workup

Histopathological Examination

Skin biopsy of the affected areas revealed the classic triad of histological features characteristic of Mal de Meleda:

  • Hyperkeratosis: Marked thickening of the stratum corneum (outermost skin layer)
  • Hypergranulosis: Increased thickness of the granular layer
  • Acanthosis: Thickening of the epidermis with elongation of rete ridges

These histopathological findings, while not entirely specific to Mal de Meleda, help exclude other differential diagnoses when combined with clinical features.

Radiographic Evaluation

Radiographic imaging of bilateral hands, wrists, feet, and ankles was performed to rule out underlying bony abnormalities. The examination revealed:

  • No evidence of bone erosions or deformities
  • Normal bone density and architecture
  • Absence of arthritis or other skeletal abnormalities

This finding is significant as it helps differentiate Mal de Meleda from other syndromic forms of PPK that may be associated with skeletal abnormalities.

Diagnostic Criteria

Definitive diagnosis of transgradient Mal de Meleda requires:

  • Clinical features: transgradient palmoplantar keratoderma extending to wrists/ankles
  • Histopathology: hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, and acanthosis
  • Family history: autosomal recessive inheritance pattern
  • Molecular confirmation: SLURP1 gene mutations (when available)

Differential Diagnosis

Several conditions must be considered when evaluating a patient with transgradient palmoplantar hyperkeratosis:

1. Unna-Thost Syndrome (Epidermolytic PPK)

  • Typically confined to palms and soles without transgradient extension
  • Autosomal dominant inheritance
  • Associated with KRT1 or KRT9 gene mutations
  • May have earlier onset (infancy)

2. Vörner Syndrome (Non-Epidermolytic PPK)

  • Diffuse PPK without transgradient features
  • Autosomal dominant inheritance
  • Less severe hyperkeratosis
  • Normal nail findings

3. Papillon-Lefèvre Syndrome

  • PPK associated with severe periodontitis and early tooth loss
  • Mutations in cathepsin C gene
  • Characteristic dental involvement distinguishes it from Mal de Meleda

4. Keratoderma Hereditarium Mutilans (Vohwinkel Syndrome)

  • PPK with characteristic constrictive bands (pseudoainhum)
  • Risk of autoamputation of digits
  • Associated with hearing loss
  • More aggressive digital involvement

5. Acquired Palmoplantar Keratoderma

  • Adult-onset without family history
  • May be associated with internal malignancy, thyroid disease, or medications
  • Requires investigation for underlying systemic conditions

The Genetic Basis: SLURP1 and Pathophysiology

Understanding the molecular foundation of Mal de Meleda provides insights into its pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets.

The SLURP1 Gene

Mal de Meleda results from mutations in the SLURP1 gene located on chromosome 8q24.3. This gene encodes the Secreted Ly-6/uPAR-Related Protein-1, a member of the Ly-6/uPAR superfamily.

Normal SLURP1 Function

  • Regulates keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation
  • Modulates nicotinic acetylcholine receptor activity
  • Influences cell adhesion and migration
  • Plays a role in maintaining epidermal homeostasis

Pathophysiology of Mutations

When SLURP1 mutations occur, the resulting protein dysfunction leads to:

  • Abnormal Keratinocyte Proliferation: Excessive cell division in the epidermis
  • Impaired Differentiation: Disrupted normal maturation of skin cells
  • Enhanced Keratinization: Excessive production of keratin protein
  • Defective Desquamation: Impaired shedding of dead skin cells

Treatment Approach and Management

While no cure exists for Mal de Meleda, effective symptomatic management can significantly improve quality of life.

Oral Retinoid Therapy (Acitretin)

The cornerstone of treatment for Mal de Meleda is oral retinoid therapy, specifically acitretin:

Treatment Protocol in This Case:

  • Initial Dose: Acitretin 25 mg daily at bedtime
  • Monitoring: Regular follow-up with liver function tests and lipid panel
  • Duration: Long-term therapy required for sustained benefit

Mechanism of Action:

  • Normalizes keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation
  • Reduces hyperkeratosis by promoting normal desquamation
  • Modulates gene expression related to skin barrier function
  • Anti-inflammatory effects

Expected Benefits:

  • Reduction in thickness of hyperkeratotic plaques
  • Decreased scaling and fissuring
  • Improved flexibility of affected skin
  • Enhanced quality of life and hand function

Topical Therapy

Adjunctive topical treatments provide additional symptomatic relief:

Urea-Based Moisturizers (Applied Twice Daily):

  • Concentrations: 10-40% urea preparations
  • Mechanism: Keratolytic and hydrating properties
  • Benefits: Softens thickened skin, enhances exfoliation
  • Application: Best applied after bathing to maximize penetration

Additional Topical Options:

  • Salicylic Acid: Keratolytic agent (3-6% preparations)
  • Lactic Acid: Alpha-hydroxy acid for gentle exfoliation
  • Topical Retinoids: May be used in combination with systemic therapy

Supportive Measures

  • Proper Footwear: Cushioned shoes to reduce pressure on affected soles
  • Regular Debridement: Professional removal of excess keratin
  • Hygiene: Thorough cleaning to prevent secondary bacterial colonization
  • Infection Prevention: Topical or oral antibiotics if secondary infection develops

Treatment Outcome

After two months of combination therapy with oral acitretin and topical urea-based moisturizers, the patient showed significant improvement with:

  • Marked reduction in hyperkeratosis thickness
  • Decreased scaling and fissuring
  • Improved skin texture and flexibility
  • Reduced itching and discomfort
  • Enhanced functional capacity of hands and feet

Long-Term Management Challenges

Despite the availability of effective therapies, several challenges persist in managing Mal de Meleda:

Treatment Limitations

  • No Cure Available: Current treatments provide only symptomatic relief
  • Lifelong Therapy Required: Discontinuation leads to relapse
  • Side Effect Management: Long-term acitretin use requires monitoring for hepatotoxicity, hyperlipidemia, and teratogenicity
  • Cost Considerations: Chronic therapy can be financially burdensome

Acitretin Side Effects Requiring Monitoring

  • Mucocutaneous effects (dry lips, nose, eyes)
  • Liver enzyme elevations
  • Lipid abnormalities (hypertriglyceridemia)
  • Skeletal hyperostosis with prolonged use
  • Teratogenicity (contraception required in women of childbearing age for 3 years post-treatment)

Psychosocial Impact

  • Aesthetic concerns affecting self-esteem
  • Social stigma and isolation
  • Functional limitations impacting education and career
  • Need for psychological support and counseling

Future Directions and Research Needs

Several areas warrant further investigation to improve outcomes for patients with Mal de Meleda:

Emerging Therapeutic Strategies

  • Gene Therapy: Potential for correcting SLURP1 mutations
  • Targeted Biologics: Agents modulating specific pathways in keratinocyte dysfunction
  • Novel Topical Formulations: Enhanced penetration and efficacy
  • Combination Therapies: Optimizing multiple treatment modalities

Research Priorities

  • Elucidating detailed pathogenic mechanisms
  • Genotype-phenotype correlation studies
  • Clinical trials of novel therapeutic agents
  • Quality of life studies and patient-reported outcomes
  • Genetic counseling protocols for affected families

Conclusion

This case report underscores the importance of recognizing rare variants of palmoplantar keratoderma, particularly the transgradient form of Mal de Meleda. Despite its rarity, prompt diagnosis through clinical suspicion, detailed examination, and histopathological confirmation enables appropriate management strategies that can significantly improve patient outcomes.

The successful treatment response to oral acitretin combined with topical urea-based moisturizers demonstrates the efficacy of current therapeutic approaches. However, the challenges of lifelong management and the absence of curative therapy highlight the need for continued research into the pathogenesis of this rare genetic disorder and the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Mal de Meleda is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by SLURP1 gene mutations
  • The transgradient variant extends beyond palms and soles to wrists and ankles
  • Diagnosis requires clinical assessment, histopathology, and genetic considerations
  • Oral acitretin remains the mainstay of therapy, supplemented by topical keratolytics
  • Long-term management requires multidisciplinary approach and patient education
  • Genetic counseling is essential for affected families
  • Continued research is needed to develop curative therapies

Book Your Consultation Today